(Un)conditional Openness: Towards a Neochartalist Theory of Money and Trust

Money on the Left: History, Theory, Practice
Vol. 1, No. 1 (2025)

ISSN 2833-051X

(Un)conditional Openness: Towards a Neochartalist Theory of Money and Trust
By Rob Hawkes

Abstract

This article argues that the neochartalist perspective on money opens up new ways of understanding trust. While neochartalism has, on occasion, been interpreted as a departure from the view that trust underpins money, this article contends that, in emphasising money’s irreducible publicness, neochartalism supports a view of money as essentially trust-based. Highlighting the blurriness of the concept of trust via a theoretical analysis of a range of approaches to and definitions of the term, across a range of disciplines, I reject calculative, strategic, and transactional formulations in favour of an understanding of trust as a form of openness that is simultaneously conditional and unconditional. Considering trust in relation to the ideas of confidence, faith, dependency, and vulnerability, I affirm the radical vision of social inclusion towards which neochartalism’s rejection of the barter myth points and argue that it provides the basis for a new approach to the conceptualisation of trust itself.

Rob Hawkes is Senior Lecturer in English Studies at Teesside University, UK. He is author of Ford Madox Ford and the Misfit Moderns (Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), Past Chair of the British Association for Modernist Studies (BAMS), and a Fellow of the English Association. He is currently completing his second monograph, Literature, Money, and Trust, 1890-1990: Monetary Modernisms.

Modern Money & the Black University Concept

Money on the Left: History, Theory, Practice
Vol. 1, No. 1 (2024)

ISSN 2833-051X

Modern Money & the Black University Concept
By Andrew J. Douglas

Abstract

Recent efforts to rethink the university as a site of monetary experimentation share several affinities with the “Black University” movement of the mid-twentieth century. Today’s “Uni” currency project, one of the more edifying policy visions to emerge from recent work in modern money theory, reimagines the university as a currency-issuing institution, a kind of public or community bank that can create money as a means of provisioning itself and mobilizing campus resources in more democratically accountable ways. The Black University movement—which, during its heyday in the late 1960s, sought to pioneer a new model of the university, one dedicated entirely to Pan-African research and community development—likewise sought to move beyond conceits of capitalist finance in order to leverage the campus community in service of cooperative and sustainable investment initiatives. In exposing their understanding of money and finance, I show how theorists of the Black University provided a rich critique of an orthodox or private money paradigm but did not have the language or conceptual tools to think beyond it, even if implicitly they imagined something like a public or modern money framework— what I call a Black counterpublic money—as fundamental to a broader Black worldmaking agenda. An appreciation of modern money theory and the potential of endogenous credit creation may help to renew the Black University movement in our time. Still, Black radical concerns about empire and racist state violence, key impetuses of the Black University, pose challenging questions for any philosophy of money rooted in the history and conceptual apparatus of European modernity.

Andrew J. Douglas is a professor of political science at Morehouse College. As a political theorist, Douglas focuses on theories and histories of Black radicalism, capitalism, money, labor, and debt. Douglas is the author of several articles and three books, including W.E.B. Du Bois and the Critique of the Competitive Society (2019) and, with Jared Loggins, Prophet of Discontent: Martin Luther King Jr. and the Critique of Racial Capitalism (2021).

Money’s Place: Science Fiction, Realism & MMT in The Ministry for the Future

Money on the Left: History, Theory, Practice
Vol. 1, No. 1 (2023)

ISSN 2833-051X

Money’s Place: Science Fiction, Realism & Modern Monetary Theory in Kim Stanley Robinson’s The Ministry for the Future
By Maxximilian Seijo

Abstract

Kim Stanley Robinson’s speculative near-future novel Ministry for the Future (2020) centers the heterodox political economy of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) to forge a new path for ecosocialist politics. This money-positive path diverges radically from critical traditions in political and literary thought that reject money as the ultimate source of environmental exploitation and climate catastrophe. In this essay, I argue that Ministry’s centering of money challenges and displaces the generic conventions of science fiction and realism, each of which has historically related to money in opposing ways. Whereas science fiction prioritizes escape to an enclave “outside” of money’s mediation of social relations, and realism laments the immanent dynamics of money’s mediating force, Ministry estranges both genres from their relationship to money by redefining money as an inextricable expression of social relation and interdependence. As opposed to dominant Marxian modes, Robinson’s redefinition draws attention to money’s radical place within the speculative imagination, disclosing new political economic and ecological capacity to remake global reproduction. 

Food, Money & Democracy

Money on the Left: History, Theory, Practice
Vol. 1, No. 1 (2022)

ISSN 2833-051X

Food, Money & Democracy: Cultivating Collective Provisioning for Resilient & Equitable Communities of Work
By Benjamin C. Wilson, Taylor Reid & Max Sussman

Abstract

Coordination rights, or the right to coordinate, is an emerging concept in law and political economy that establishes who is permitted to engage in economic coordination and who does not. Coordination rights are fundamental to the process of building resilient communities and determine whether social provisioning systems are “collective” or “concentrated.” In concentrated provisioning systems, decision-making is consolidated in the hands of a few actors who tend to prioritize profit-seeking over environmental and labor concerns, leading to inequality and ecosystem degradation. Collective provisioning systems instead involve rich human experiences that foster cooperation and a holistic approach to production that improves environmental and social wellbeing. We demonstrate these differences through comparative analysis of industrial agriculture and alternatives such as the La Via Campesina movement for Food Sovereignty, the Black Cooperative Movement in the U.S., and restaurant reactions to the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, what is also displayed is that without reliable access to monetary resources collective provisioning systems are vulnerable to financial crisis and collapse. Alleviating these vulnerabilities requires that monetary systems themselves also adopt collective coordination principles. Accordingly, we present small and medium-scale monetary experiments that use food systems as a way to build community capacity. These experiments challenge the exclusionary nature of the dominant profit-driven mode of financial coordination and illustrate the potential of community-driven and socially beneficial frameworks for increasing resilience, equity, and health in our communities.

Benjamin C. Wilson is associate professor of economics at the State University of New York College at Cortland and Research Scholar for the Global Institute for Sustainable Prosperity.

Taylor Reid is an Associate Professor of Applied Food Studies at the Culinary Institute of America in Hyde Park, New York.

Max Sussman has been a chef for over 20 years. He was formerly the chef de cuisine of Roberta’s in Brooklyn, New York. With his brother Eli he has co-authored 4 cookbooks and owns Samesa, a fast-casual Mediterranean restaurant in New York City. With his wife Kate he founded Bog & Thunder, a regenerative food travel company based in Ireland.

See our Instructions for Authors page, if you are interested in submitting or pitching an essay to the journal.

Money on the left: History, Theory, Practice – Call for Papers

We are pleased to invite contributions to Money on the Left: History, Theory, Practice. Money on the Left publishes peer-reviewed articles about monetary arrangements, knowledges, and cultures with the aim of promoting ecosocial justice. This open-access journal understands money creation as a situated political problem that constitutes societies. It moves away from claims that money is a scarce instrument of barter, an inherent (if necessary) evil, or the infamous commodity-form and toward actualizing money’s unrealized potentials to shape collective life in emancipatory ways. 

How we imagine money shapes and is shaped by cultural and institutional forms. From this premise, we affirm money’s public possibilities in the hope of replacing austere political and aesthetic patterns of governance, coordination, and ideation with alternatives that are capacious, equitable, and just. Thus, we advance understandings of monetary history, theory, and practice that foreground intersectional, ecological, and ethical responsibility, and foster democratic forms of monetary agency.

We seek submissions from across the humanities and social sciences and we are especially keen to hear from authors from under-represented groups (both within the academy in general and within economic discourse in particular). Moreover, we welcome contributions from established scholars, graduate students, and independent researchers and – in keeping with our commitment to interdisciplinarity – from authors adopting a range (or a combination) of methodological, analytical, discursive, and stylistic approaches. While we accept manuscripts primarily in English, please contact us to explore the options for submissions in other languages.

Possible topics for Money on the Left articles include, but are by no means limited to:

  • Contemporary politics and provisioning: critiquing political language and rhetorical framing (public spending as funded by ‘taxpayer money’ or the ‘government credit card/checkbook’); studying political and resource implications of a Job Guarantee and Green New Deal (food, housing, energy, the ‘cost of living’); contesting the orthodox conceptions of loanable funds banking, pricing, and ‘inflation’
  • Ecology and environment: addressing the imaginative/conceptual/rhetorical barriers to a Green New Deal and a just transition from ecologically harmful industries and practices
  • History: uncovering overlooked histories of monetary practice, monetary politics, social movements, and economic thought
  • Legal studies: developing the constitutional theory of money, coordination rights theory, vulnerability theory, and critical finance
  • Aesthetics, art and design: complicating theories of sensation and sensuous form; exploring how artistic representations of money and finance shape collective life; scrutinizing design and symbolism in monetary systems, technics, and tokens  
  • Heterodox economics: theorizing monetary power, capacity and agency, the hierarchy of money and the ‘finance franchise’ from the perspectives of Modern Monetary Theory/neo-chartalism, post-Keynesian, institutional, ecological, and feminist economics
  • Global studies: examining monetary agency in pre- and postcolonial contexts; challenging anglo-/euro-/western-/northern-centric biases within political economic discourses; reviving cultural representations of money and monetary agency in pre- and postcolonial texts and contexts
  • Feminist studies, gender studies, and queer theory: investigating historically and culturally gendered assumptions and language about work, productivity, budgeting, and ‘fiscal responsibility’; researching queer politics, performativity, community, and care 
  • Critical theory: revealing new analyses of key thinkers, fresh combinations of theoretical texts and approaches, tensions and convergences between theoretical frameworks 
  • Literary studies: voicing fresh interpretations of literary works from a constitutional theory or MMT perspective; discovering conjunctions between literary and monetary form; reading literary narratives that thematize or foreground money; analyzing the literal and figurative languages of money
  • Media and communication studies: understanding money as a medium; rethinking monetary history conceived as a history of mediation from early writing to the digital age
  • Film, video, and television: evaluating cinematic, videographic, and televisual engagements with money, finance, corporations, markets, care, community, cooperation

This list is intended to be indicative but by no means exhaustive. Please feel free to contact journal@moneyontheleft.org to explore ideas and possibilities prior to the submission of your manuscript.

Unless otherwise indicated, submissions to Money on the Left will undergo anonymous peer-review prior to publication. Before submitting a manuscript for review, please ensure that it satisfies the following criteria:

  1. The manuscript should include (1) a title; (2) an abstract or a summary of the argument not to exceed 300 words; and (3) a bibliography or works cited page.
  2. The manuscript should adhere to an established style guide. Use of Chicago Style (17th edition) with endnotes is strongly preferred, and will help to streamline the review and publication processes. 
  3. The manuscript should not include copyrighted material, unless the author(s) are able to demonstrate that they have previously received written permission from the copyright holder to use said material.

Manuscripts should be submitted via email to journal@moneyontheleft.org, and should be accompanied by a note to the editors that clearly indicates that the manuscript (1) is not currently under review with another journal; and (2) has not been published elsewhere. 

Money on the Left is published under a Creative Commons license. Authors retain full copyright ownership of work published in the Money on the Left journal.

To find out more about our project, explore the extensive archive of interviews on the Money on the Left podcast, where we also discuss and share the work published in our journal.